Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAT-15853 DevOps :: Deprecate Snyk and replace with GHAS #215

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jandroav
Copy link
Contributor

feat(codeql.yml): add CodeQL workflow for continuous code analysis and security scanning

chore(snyk): remove .snyk policy file as it is no longer needed

…d security scanning

chore(snyk): remove .snyk policy file as it is no longer needed
@jandroav jandroav merged commit f2bda49 into main Jan 16, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

Label error: This PR is being prevented from merging because you have not added one of the labels: breakingChanges, newContributors, notableChanges, sdou, skipReleaseNotes, TypeBug, TypeEnhancement, TypeTest. You'll need to add it before this PR can be merged.

@jandroav jandroav deleted the DAT-15853 branch January 16, 2024 07:45
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant