defensive coding: allow python generators more places #782
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… if there's a risk of multiple consumption
jmartin-tech
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2024
jmartin-tech
changed the title
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
resolves #96
Probes should be able to return a generator of attemptsprobes.base.Probe._execute_all()(1) should be able to consume a generator of attemptsGenerators should be able to return a generator of outputsattempts (2) should be able to consume a generator of outputsDetectors should be able to return generators of resultsEvaluator¬s (3) should be able to consume generators of results --> enforced inHarness`; cast to detect() result to list, making multiple consumption safe