Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

langchain[minor]: use langsmith sdk for prompts functionality instead of langchain hub #6323

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 1, 2024

Conversation

madams0013
Copy link
Contributor

@madams0013 madams0013 commented Aug 1, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 1, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
langchainjs-api-refs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 1, 2024 10:23pm
langchainjs-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 1, 2024 10:23pm

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. auto:improvement Medium size change to existing code to handle new use-cases labels Aug 1, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 1, 2024
@bracesproul bracesproul changed the title feat: use langsmith sdk for prompts functionality instead of langchai… langchain[minor]: use langsmith sdk for prompts functionality instead of langchain hub Aug 1, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@bracesproul bracesproul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm PRs that are ready to be merged as-is label Aug 1, 2024
const payloadOptions = {
object: runnable,
parentCommitHash: options?.parentCommitHash,
isPublic: options?.isPublic,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, you still need to respect the old values:

isPublic: options?.isPublic ?? options?.newRepoIsPublic,

object: runnable,
parentCommitHash: options?.parentCommitHash,
isPublic: options?.isPublic,
description: options?.description,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here, see above

@jacoblee93
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto:improvement Medium size change to existing code to handle new use-cases lgtm PRs that are ready to be merged as-is size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants