Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: splitup table_functions.h #2142

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Riolku
Copy link
Contributor

@Riolku Riolku commented Oct 4, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (851b567) 89.63% compared to head (cc1a65c) 89.63%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2142      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.63%   89.63%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         988      997       +9     
  Lines       35729    35729              
==========================================
- Hits        32027    32024       -3     
- Misses       3702     3705       +3     
Files Coverage Δ
src/binder/bind/bind_graph_pattern.cpp 94.72% <ø> (ø)
src/binder/bind/bind_reading_clause.cpp 79.66% <ø> (ø)
src/catalog/catalog_content.cpp 97.38% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
src/function/built_in_table_functions.cpp 90.90% <ø> (ø)
src/function/table_functions/current_setting.cpp 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/function/table_functions/db_version.cpp 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/function/table_functions/show_tables.cpp 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/function/table_functions/table_info.cpp 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../binder/query/reading_clause/bound_in_query_call.h 66.66% <ø> (ø)
src/include/catalog/catalog.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 9 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Riolku Riolku merged commit 37800fe into master Oct 4, 2023
10 of 11 checks passed
@Riolku Riolku deleted the splitup-table-functions branch October 4, 2023 18:13
Riolku added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2023
As mentioned by @benjaminwinger, since these functions are only
reference in this source file, they need not be in headers, and can all
be completely inlined in the source file instead. Ref #2142.
Riolku added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2023
As mentioned by @benjaminwinger, since these functions are only
reference in this source file, they need not be in headers, and can all
be completely inlined in the source file instead. Ref #2142.
Riolku added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2023
As mentioned by @benjaminwinger, since these functions are only
reference in this source file, they need not be in headers, and can all
be completely inlined in the source file instead. Ref #2142.
Riolku added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2023
As mentioned by @benjaminwinger, since these functions are only
reference in this source file, they need not be in headers, and can all
be completely inlined in the source file instead. Ref #2142.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants