Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix load-balance configmap value #3954

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2019

Conversation

alexkursell
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it: The load-balance configmap value was being ignored. Additionally, the documentation was out of date. Additionally additionally, there were a bunch of if statements in the upstream construction logic that were always true, so I removed them. An e2e test is also added to check that the configmap value is applied.

Which issue this PR fixes : fixes #3929

Special notes for your reviewer: This PR assumes the per-ingress load-balance annotation should override the global load-balance configmap value. If this isn't the case, please tell me so I can edit the PR.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 1, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3954 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3954      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.25%   54.24%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          83       83              
  Lines        6163     6161       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         3344     3342       -2     
  Misses       2426     2426              
  Partials      393      393
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/ingress/controller/controller.go 41.24% <100%> (-0.16%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b87cc5a...4f819b6. Read the comment docs.

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Apr 1, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 1, 2019
@ElvinEfendi
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aledbf, alexkursell, ElvinEfendi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

@panpan0000 panpan0000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks awesome

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 39ecab8 into kubernetes:master Apr 2, 2019
@alexkursell alexkursell deleted the lb-configmap branch April 2, 2019 14:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Why was LoadBalancerAlgorithm removed from configuration?
6 participants