-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use calico_pool_blocksize from cluster when existing #10516
Merged
k8s-ci-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes-sigs:master
from
VannTen:fix/calico_ippool_blocksize
Oct 30, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need also to merge the CIDR? update the CIDR of the existing ippool is dangerous.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd say it depends on whether we consider changing the cidr as part of the playbook a valid use-case, and what's the "default history" of the
cidr
attribute is (I came across this little inconvenience because the blockSize default changed apparently, because those clusters never had an explicit setting in their inventory for that).Changing the blockSize is definitely out of scope, because it's simply impossible, since it's immutable in the IPPool. The cidr, I don't know.
Overall, I would err on the side on keeping it that way, for minimal changes (which might be breaking someone workflow => can't be the case for
blockSize
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, It's ok for me.
In your case, the default blocksize was not used when the cluster was installed, but the default value was still used when upgrading the cluster, right? It makes sense that blocksize is immutable so we don't make it be updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I think that's how it went. The clusters were installed some years ago (not by me), and I think for some it was the calico default value for blocksize (26) and for others... well I don't really know ^^.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I used to change the blockSize of calico from 24 to 26(#9055) because it was consistent with the upstream of calico. maybe your cluster was created before this PR merged.