Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for shielded instance #777

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2022

Conversation

eranco74
Copy link
Contributor

@eranco74 eranco74 commented Dec 8, 2022

/kind feature
/kind api-change

What this PR does / why we need it:
The PR adds support for shielded instances

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #776

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests

Release note:

Add shielded instance config  to API

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API labels Dec 8, 2022
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Dec 8, 2022

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: eranco74 / name: Eran Cohen (b1a0e3a)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 8, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @eranco74!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @eranco74. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 8, 2022
api/v1beta1/gcpmachine_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/gcpmachine_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/gcpmachine_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/gcpmachine_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/gcpmachine_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/gcpmachine_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/gcpmachine_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1beta1/gcpmachine_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JoelSpeed
Copy link

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 8, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Dec 10, 2022

/assign @richardcase

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Dec 12, 2022

/test ls

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cpanato: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-build
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-e2e-test
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-make
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-test
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-apidiff
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-capi-e2e
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-conformance
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-conformance-ci-artifacts
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-coverage
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-e2e-workload-upgrade

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-apidiff
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-build
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-e2e-test
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-make
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-test
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-verify

In response to this:

/test ls

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Dec 12, 2022

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-e2e-workload-upgrade
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-capi-e2e
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-conformance

@eranco74 eranco74 requested review from JoelSpeed and removed request for dims and cpanato December 12, 2022 11:47
@eranco74
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @dims @cpanato

Copy link
Member

@cpanato cpanato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/hold for more reviews
/assign @richardcase

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 12, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato, eranco74

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 12, 2022
cloud/scope/machine.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@richardcase
Copy link
Member

Just a nit (which is just personal preference), so:

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 12, 2022
Copy link

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No further feedback from me now, though I do like the suggestion from @richardcase

cloud/scope/machine.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 12, 2022
Add manual conversion for ShieldedInstanceConfig
Set instance.ShieldedInstanceConfig according to GCPMachine.Spec.ShieldedInstanceConfig
@eranco74 eranco74 requested review from richardcase and removed request for dims December 13, 2022 08:06
@richardcase
Copy link
Member

@eranco74 - appreciate you took the time to look at the nit 🙇

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 13, 2022
@JoelSpeed
Copy link

/lgtm

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Dec 13, 2022

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 13, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 63dd30c into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 13, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.1.0 milestone Dec 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Shielded VM support
6 participants