Adding local field to function for handling transient spec (Local.Remote)

[vyasgun]

Added a Local field to represent the local spec (such as Remote)

Changes

• 🎁 Added a new field Local.Remote to the function spec
• 🎁 Modified func.write to write it only to .func/local.yaml so it is not persisted across clones but only locally
• 🎁 Added unit tests to ensure the expected behaviour

/kind enhancement

Fixes #

Release Note

Docs

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 14 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (a4e4885) 61.68% compared to head (824941c) 65.14%.
Report is 89 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
pkg/functions/function.go	51.72%	9 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2121      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   61.68%   65.14%   +3.46%     
==========================================
  Files         106      108       +2     
  Lines       13693    13919     +226     
==========================================
+ Hits         8446     9068     +622     
+ Misses       4400     3952     -448     
- Partials      847      899      +52     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e-test	37.37% <38.70%> (+2.19%)	⬆️
e2e-test-oncluster	30.58% <51.61%> (+0.14%)	⬆️
e2e-test-oncluster-runtime	26.82% <25.80%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-go	25.57% <38.70%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-node	26.57% <38.70%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-python	26.57% <38.70%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-quarkus	26.68% <38.70%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-rust	25.57% <38.70%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-springboot	25.71% <38.70%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-typescript	26.68% <38.70%> (?)
integration-tests	51.85% <32.25%> (+2.52%)	⬆️
unit-tests-macos-latest	48.85% <54.83%> (?)
unit-tests-ubuntu-latest	49.59% <54.83%> (?)
unit-tests-windows-latest	48.87% <54.83%> (+0.62%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[lkingland]

This is looking very good. Thanks for the contribution @vyasgun !

[lkingland]

Good explanation

[knative-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lkingland, vyasgun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [lkingland,vyasgun]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment