chore: Update client-go dependency to aligned version

[dsimansk]

Changes

@matejvasek following up on the previous topic on your PR. It seems client-go would newer be bumped because it was stuck in func's go.mod now. IMO it was chain of previous versions from Tekton, that introduced it in a first place.

• 🧹 chore: Update client-go dependency to aligned version

/kind

Fixes #

Release Note

chore: Update client-go dependency to aligned version

[matejvasek]

/approve
/lgtm

[knative-prow]

@dsimansk: The label(s) kind/<kind> cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

Changes

@matejvasek following up on the previous topic on your PR. It seems client-go would newer be bumped because it was stuck in func's go.mod now. IMO it was chain of previous versions from Tekton, that introduced it in a first place.

• 🧹 chore: Update client-go dependency to aligned version

/kind

Fixes #

Release Note

chore: Update client-go dependency to aligned version

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +1.01% 🎉

Comparison is base (7a7e4bf) 61.73% compared to head (2435bf5) 62.75%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1957      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   61.73%   62.75%   +1.01%     
==========================================
  Files         106      106              
  Lines       13678    13678              
==========================================
+ Hits         8444     8583     +139     
+ Misses       4389     4229     -160     
- Partials      845      866      +21     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e-test	36.12% <ø> (-16.65%)	⬇️
e2e-test-oncluster	30.38% <ø> (ø)
e2e-test-runtime-go	25.62% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-node	26.63% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-python	26.63% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-quarkus	26.74% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-rust	25.62% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-springboot	25.76% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-typescript	26.74% <ø> (?)
integration-tests	51.37% <ø> (?)
unit-tests-macos-latest	48.17% <ø> (?)
unit-tests-ubuntu-latest	48.96% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests-windows-latest	48.20% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[matejvasek]

/retest-all

[matejvasek]

/retest

[matejvasek]

/help

[matejvasek]

/approve
/lgtm

[knative-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dsimansk, matejvasek

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [dsimansk,matejvasek]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment