Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency remark-rehype to v11 #35

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 19, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
remark-rehype ~10.1.0 -> ~11.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

remarkjs/remark-rehype (remark-rehype)

v11.0.0

Compare Source

Change
  • 30091c7 Change to require Node.js 16
    migrate: update too
  • cafeacc Change to use exports
    migrate: don’t use private APIs
  • acb292a Update mdast-util-to-hast, @types/{hast,mdast}, unified, etc
    migrate: update too
    if you don’t use handlers, this should be fine;
    if you do, see mdast-util-to-hast@13.0.0
  • ba50965 Remove Processor type
    migrate: get it from unified
Add
  • b990986 Add exports of defaultFootnoteBackContent, defaultFootnoteBackLabel

Full Changelog: remarkjs/remark-rehype@10.1.0...11.0.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@jaywcjlove jaywcjlove merged commit 95ce8e7 into main Sep 28, 2023
1 check failed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/remark-rehype-11.x branch September 28, 2023 05:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant