Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix XLA import path #12898

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 3, 2023
Merged

Fix XLA import path #12898

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 3, 2023

Conversation

jpienaar
Copy link
Member

@jpienaar jpienaar commented Apr 3, 2023

The pipeline wasn't following the route documented post refactoring,
which led to tuples not being handled correctly: the flatten tuple pass
required CF form to operate on and not SCF form.

We can make this a bit more automatic (and we have the tracking bug to
avoid even specifying type here).

This is for the legacy import path.

The pipeline wasn't following the route documented post refactoring,
which led to tuples not being handled correctly: the flatten tuple pass
required CF form to operate on and not SCF form.

We can make this a bit more automatic (and we have the tracking bug to
avoid even specifying type here).
@jpienaar jpienaar changed the title optional2 Fix XLA import path Apr 3, 2023
@jpienaar jpienaar requested review from dellis23 and removed request for benvanik, MaheshRavishankar and hanhanW April 3, 2023 15:17
@jpienaar jpienaar enabled auto-merge (squash) April 3, 2023 15:18
@jpienaar jpienaar merged commit e768c17 into main Apr 3, 2023
@jpienaar jpienaar deleted the optional2 branch April 3, 2023 15:54
jpienaar added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2023
The pipeline wasn't following the route documented post refactoring,
which led to tuples not being handled correctly: the flatten tuple pass
required CF form to operate on and not SCF form.

We can make this a bit more automatic (and we have the tracking bug to
avoid even specifying type here).

This is for the legacy import path.
NatashaKnk pushed a commit to NatashaKnk/iree that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
The pipeline wasn't following the route documented post refactoring,
which led to tuples not being handled correctly: the flatten tuple pass
required CF form to operate on and not SCF form.

We can make this a bit more automatic (and we have the tracking bug to
avoid even specifying type here).

This is for the legacy import path.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants