Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(cardano-chain-follower): Overhead benchmark implementations (pallas + cardano-chain-follower) #211

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

FelipeRosa
Copy link
Contributor

@FelipeRosa FelipeRosa commented Apr 17, 2024

Description

NOTE:
This replaces #206. I have added @saibatizoku as a co-author in the commits as his draft PR served as inspiration for this.

This PR implements a benchmark to measure the overhead that the internal implementation of the cardano-chain-follower has in comparison to using the pallas library directly to read a Mithril snapshot.

Related Issues

Closes #201.

… + cardano-chain-follower)

Co-authored-by: Joaquín Rosales <joaquin.rosales@iohk.io>
@FelipeRosa FelipeRosa marked this pull request as draft April 18, 2024 05:11
@FelipeRosa FelipeRosa changed the title feat(cardano-chain-follower): Basic benchmark implementations (pallas + cardano-chain-follower) feat(cardano-chain-follower): Overhead benchmark implementations (pallas + cardano-chain-follower) Apr 18, 2024
@FelipeRosa FelipeRosa force-pushed the feat/cardano-chain-follower-benchmark branch 4 times, most recently from 77894da to 907b710 Compare April 20, 2024 04:09
@FelipeRosa FelipeRosa marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2024 04:10
@FelipeRosa FelipeRosa force-pushed the feat/cardano-chain-follower-benchmark branch from 907b710 to 19db54f Compare April 20, 2024 04:12
@FelipeRosa FelipeRosa force-pushed the feat/cardano-chain-follower-benchmark branch from 19db54f to a4ace8c Compare April 20, 2024 04:22
Copy link
Collaborator

@minikin minikin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@FelipeRosa We need to consider publishing benchmark results in the future.
What do you think?

@FelipeRosa
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM

@FelipeRosa We need to consider publishing benchmark results in the future. What do you think?

I agree. We need to define how we are going to do that because running the benchmarks also involves downloading/storing Mithril snapshots which, for mainnet specially, can be big. Maybe we want to consider triggering them manually or nightly (something like that).

@minikin
Copy link
Collaborator

minikin commented Apr 25, 2024

task to publish results #217

@minikin minikin merged commit 433a72b into main Apr 25, 2024
33 checks passed
@minikin minikin deleted the feat/cardano-chain-follower-benchmark branch April 25, 2024 10:21
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

🛠️ [TASK] : Baseline mithril performance integration tests
2 participants