-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate annotations from core schema type #29
Conversation
The Travis failure is so weird. How can it fail in the PR but not in the branch? Furthermore, it seems completely non-reproducible in my machine, with either LTS or Nightly. |
Now I understand, the problem is that it's conflicting with the |
Apparently it didn't work 😖 |
I am fairly confident that now it should work. Please review and merge if it's green :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! 👏
Before definitions like the id for ProtoBuf were part of the schema. However, that meant that we could not retro-fit the same schema for different purposes. This PR separates these two concepts and updates the Template Haskell code, so examples don't need to change.
This change will be properly documented in #31