Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up ref name rules #6437

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 26, 2019
Merged

Clean up ref name rules #6437

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 26, 2019

Conversation

mrsdizzie
Copy link
Member

Clean up checks on reference names to better conform to the guideline
here: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-check-ref-format

This fixes half of #6321

To see example of current problem, just try and create a branch or tag with a valid name containing allowed special characters like test+me. It will incorrectly say TagName must be a well-formed Git reference name

I've tried to add several extra tests as well since if a bad name gets by this check it can later through a less friendly 500 error if we try to create a branch with a bad name

Clean up checks on reference names to better conform to the guideline
here: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-check-ref-format

This fixes half of go-gitea#6321
According to: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-check-ref-format

And: git check-ref-format "master/feature=test1"

This is a valid branch name and we should not be testing for it to fail.
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Mar 26, 2019
@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.9.0 milestone Mar 26, 2019
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Mar 26, 2019
@lafriks lafriks merged commit d056bf3 into go-gitea:master Mar 26, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #6437 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6437      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   38.85%   38.85%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         365      365              
  Lines       51413    51414       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        19978    19977       -1     
- Misses      28566    28568       +2     
  Partials     2869     2869
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
routers/repo/branch.go 58.19% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
modules/validation/binding.go 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
modules/auth/auth.go 50.4% <0%> (-0.81%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b4941f7...aced5e7. Read the comment docs.

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Mar 26, 2019

Please send backport to release v1.7 and v1.8 branches

mrsdizzie added a commit to mrsdizzie/gitea that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2019
* Clean up ref name rules

Clean up checks on reference names to better conform to the guideline
here: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-check-ref-format

This fixes half of go-gitea#6321

* Update branch create integration test

According to: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-check-ref-format

And: git check-ref-format "master/feature=test1"

This is a valid branch name and we should not be testing for it to fail.
@techknowlogick techknowlogick added the backport/done All backports for this PR have been created label Mar 26, 2019
mrsdizzie added a commit to mrsdizzie/gitea that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2019
* Clean up ref name rules

Clean up checks on reference names to better conform to the guideline
here: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-check-ref-format

This fixes half of go-gitea#6321

* Update branch create integration test

According to: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-check-ref-format

And: git check-ref-format "master/feature=test1"

This is a valid branch name and we should not be testing for it to fail.
zeripath pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2019
@zeripath zeripath mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2019
3 tasks
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Mar 27, 2019

@techknowlogick since #6321 marked as v1.7.5 I think we should also back port to v1.7 forget my words

@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport/done All backports for this PR have been created lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants