Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add jq interpreters #6694

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2024
Merged

Add jq interpreters #6694

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

Alhadis
Copy link
Collaborator

@Alhadis Alhadis commented Feb 3, 2024

Description

This pull-request adds a list of interpreters for the jq language:

  • gojq: Pure Go implementation of jq
  • jaq: Pure Rust implementation of jq
  • jq: The OG jq.
  • jqjq: jq implemented in jq. Seriously.
  • jqq: jq with REPL support
  • query-json: Pure Reason implementation of jq

Resolves: #6660

(Template removed as it doesn't apply).

@Alhadis Alhadis requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2024 11:55
@Alhadis Alhadis requested a review from lildude February 3, 2024 11:56
lildude
lildude approved these changes Feb 20, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@lildude lildude left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I'll merge this when I make the next release.

@lildude lildude added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit c91b03e Mar 8, 2024
8 checks passed
@lildude lildude deleted the jq-interpreters branch March 8, 2024 16:22
@github-linguist github-linguist locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@lildude lildude lildude approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@Alhadis @lildude