Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump in Garden: ign-common and dependents #567

Closed
14 tasks
chapulina opened this issue Nov 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed
14 tasks

Bump in Garden: ign-common and dependents #567

chapulina opened this issue Nov 19, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@chapulina
Copy link
Contributor

This should come after #545, it could be combined with #554, which hasn't started yet

Note that if

Libraries being bumped:

  • ign-common5: DEM support (Geospatial component for heightmap & DEMs gazebosim/gz-common#267)

    • Source code of all downstream libraries (example)
    • Release repositories of all downstream libraries (example)
    • Use main branch on gazebodistro (example)
    • Build nightlies from the main branch (example)
    • Update gzdev to use nightlies on CI (example)
    • homebrew-simulation: create formula and update dependencies (example)
    • docs (the collection’s page) (example)
  • ign-physics6: Depends on ign-common

    • Source code of all downstream libraries (example)
    • Release repositories of all downstream libraries (example)
    • Use main branch on gazebodistro (example)
    • Build nightlies from the main branch (example)
    • Update gzdev to use nightlies on CI (example)
    • homebrew-simulation: create formula and update dependencies (example)
    • docs (the collection’s page) (example)

Downstream libraries affected:

scpeters added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2021
Preparation for #554, #567.

Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <scpeters@openrobotics.org>
scpeters added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2021
Preparation for #554, #567.

Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <scpeters@openrobotics.org>
@chapulina
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #574, it's easier to do all libraries at once.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant