Refactor label keys in RuntimeInfo

[omerap12]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Refactor label key functions from the Runtime struct by moving them to the utils package.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

As part of #978, I'm splitting this into separate PRs, starting with refactoring label key functions from the Runtime struct and moving them to the utils package.

Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.

No new tests are required, as the existing tests already cover the functionality and the function signatures remain unchanged.

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

[fluid-e2e-bot]

Hi @omerap12. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[cheyang]

@omerap12 thanks for your contribution. Could you check why the project check is failed? https://github.com/fluid-cloudnative/fluid/actions/runs/10376419144/job/28728332638?pr=4271

[omerap12]

@omerap12 thanks for your contribution. Could you check why the project check is failed? https://github.com/fluid-cloudnative/fluid/actions/runs/10376419144/job/28728332638?pr=4271

Yes , of course

[omerap12]

Hey @cheyang , fixed . ( lint errors don't related to me I think)
Do you need me to rebase my commits?

[TrafalgarZZZ]

/lgtm
LGTM and thank you for your great refactoring @omerap12 !

BTW, @cheyang do we have any plan to remove codes related to such deprecated labels? It has been several published versions since we deprecated them. I think now it would be okay to remove them.

[omerap12]

Sure no problem @TrafalgarZZZ :)

[cheyang]

/lgtm LGTM and thank you for your great refactoring @omerap12 !

BTW, @cheyang do we have any plan to remove codes related to such deprecated labels? It has been several published versions since we deprecated them. I think now it would be okay to remove them.

Thank you for your suggestion. It's fine to remove them after v1.0 releases.

[cheyang]

@omerap12 Please fix the project check /lint :https://github.com/fluid-cloudnative/fluid/actions/runs/10393294698/job/28780447009?pr=4271

[omerap12]

@cheyang , done

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[cheyang]

/lgtm
/approve

[fluid-e2e-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cheyang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [cheyang]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[cheyang]

Thanks very much @omerap12 .