Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

save status quo name and feature when multiple status quo present #2457

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ItsMrLin
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: When multiple status_quo is present in the data, we should still be able to save status quo name and features, which should be the same for all these status quos.

Differential Revision: D57309789

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label May 14, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57309789

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.31%. Comparing base (ac44a66) to head (9a45af5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2457   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.31%   95.31%           
=======================================
  Files         497      497           
  Lines       48349    48370   +21     
=======================================
+ Hits        46083    46104   +21     
  Misses       2266     2266           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

ItsMrLin added a commit to ItsMrLin/Ax that referenced this pull request May 14, 2024
…acebook#2457)

Summary:

When multiple status_quo is present in the data, we should still be able to save status quo name and features, which should be the same for all these status quos.

Differential Revision: D57309789
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57309789

…acebook#2457)

Summary:

When multiple status_quo is present in the data, we should still be able to save status quo name and features, which should be the same for all these status quos.

Reviewed By: esantorella

Differential Revision: D57309789
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57309789

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 6092ac3.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants