Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 3, 2024. It is now read-only.

Coordination-Thread: Merge Göerli execution-testnet with Prater consensus-testnet #98

Closed
q9f opened this issue Mar 23, 2022 · 14 comments
Closed

Comments

@q9f
Copy link
Member

q9f commented Mar 23, 2022

This is an early notice to the Göerli validators that the intention is to merge(TM) the Goerli execution-testnet with the Prater consensus-testnet. In case of a merge, Clique-POA validators will be relieved from their duty and replaced by the Beacon-POS validator set of the Prater network.

Tagging current validators @q9f @roninkaizen @igorbarinov @jparyani @prestonvanloon @tkstanczak @egalano @Errorific @karalabe - if you want to continue validating after the merge, make sure you have a Prater validator.

cc @parithosh

@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

Thanks @q9f!

As I understand it, Goerli sealers will continue to perform their work until the terminal total difficulty is reached and then these sealers can be safely turned down/off.

How will we coordinate a difficulty change in Goerli clique?

@q9f
Copy link
Member Author

q9f commented Mar 30, 2022

I don't think there should be much of a difference, we just have to select a sensible terminal total difficulty. Each block in clique adds 1 or 2 difficulty.

@Jiangzy520

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@yangdiweif

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@q9f

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@q9f
Copy link
Member Author

q9f commented May 17, 2022

Updated the website https://goerli.net/ 🤓

@q9f q9f pinned this issue May 18, 2022
@q9f
Copy link
Member Author

q9f commented May 25, 2022

I activated 20k validators on Prater on behalf of Goerli.

https://prater.beaconcha.in/blocks?q=Goerli

@q9f
Copy link
Member Author

q9f commented Jun 3, 2022

created a web app for block numbers and difficulties: https://ttd.goerli.net/

Screenshot at 2022-06-03 13-58-44

@ryanschneider
Copy link

@q9f will we need to update our current Clique validator to run alongside a CL pair or will configuring them w/ a new EL that accepts the TTD be enough?

@q9f
Copy link
Member Author

q9f commented Jun 10, 2022

@q9f will we need to update our current Clique validator to run alongside a CL pair or will configuring them w/ a new EL that accepts the TTD be enough?

I have my EL authority on a different machine than the CL validators, but it should be perfectly fine to have both on the same machine.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Contributor

Goerli has now merged 🎉 ! Should we close this?

@q9f q9f closed this as completed Aug 19, 2022
@q9f
Copy link
Member Author

q9f commented Aug 19, 2022

🎉

@ryanschneider
Copy link

ryanschneider commented Oct 11, 2022 via email

@parithosh
Copy link
Member

Now that Goerli has been merged, there's no reason to run the clique signers anymore. They can be shutdown.

@q9f q9f unpinned this issue Oct 25, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants