Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[flash] Compute size correctly for > 256MBit (IDFGH-8063) #9566

Closed

Conversation

KonssnoK
Copy link
Contributor

This is a generic replacement for
#9381

The computation of the size seems to be done by considering the byte being decimal and not hex.

@espressif-bot espressif-bot added the Status: Opened Issue is new label Aug 16, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title [flash] Compute size correctly for > 256MBit [flash] Compute size correctly for > 256MBit (IDFGH-8063) Aug 16, 2022
Copy link

@johnboiles johnboiles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@johnboiles
Copy link

@igrr I closed my similar PR you commented on. I think this one is better since you established that this scheme is common amongst chip vendors.

@KonssnoK
Copy link
Contributor Author

any update on this ? @Alvin1Zhang

@espressif-bot espressif-bot added Resolution: NA Issue resolution is unavailable Status: Done Issue is done internally Resolution: Done Issue is done internally and removed Status: Opened Issue is new Resolution: NA Issue resolution is unavailable labels Nov 22, 2022
@johnboiles
Copy link

Woohoo!

@KonssnoK
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mythbuster5 is this going to be backported to 4.4?
thanks

espressif-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2023
espressif-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
johnboiles pushed a commit to sindarin-inc/esp-idf that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Resolution: Done Issue is done internally Status: Done Issue is done internally
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants