-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 174
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update module documentation #1763
Conversation
Thanks for this. Will probably take me a couple days to review with that many files changes, can't see myself sitting down and just powering through all that, just FYI. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for working on this! LGTM, I left a few comments.
//! capable of measuring analog signals from specific analog I/O pins. One or | ||
//! more ADC units are available, depending on the device being used. | ||
//! ## Overview | ||
//! The ADC is integrated on the chip, and is capable of measuring analog |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we can leave the Analog to Digital Converter here?
//! precise control over voltage levels using one of the onboard | ||
//! digital-to-analog converters (DAC). | ||
//! ## Overview | ||
//! Espressif devices usually have multiple DAC channels. Each DAC channel can |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as above?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couple quick comments, I'm a little over half done reviewing and looks quite good so far. Will try to wrap this up later today or tomorrow morning.
006cb38
to
eac550d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a few more little things (sorry!) and then I think this is probably good to go.
Co-authored-by: Jesse Braham <jessebraham@users.noreply.github.com>
b263685
to
cd66b10
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
Thank you for your contribution!
We appreciate the time and effort you've put into this pull request.
To help us review it efficiently, please ensure you've gone through the following checklist:
Submission Checklist 馃摑
cargo xtask fmt-packages
command to ensure that all changed code is formatted correctly.CHANGELOG.md
in the proper section.Extra:
Pull Request Details 馃摉
Description
First PR for unifying the format of module documentation. Used this format:
Still a lot of modules to be updated, but this is already a big PR (sorry)
Should close #1660
Testing
Built the documentation and ran the doc-tests.