Fix date_nanos in composite aggs #53315
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It looks like `date_nanos` fields weren't likely to work properly in composite aggs because composites iterate field values using points and we weren't converting the points into milliseconds. Because the doc values were coming back in milliseconds we ended up geting very confused and just never collecting sub-aggregations. This fixes that by adding a method to `DateFieldMapper.Resolution` to `parsePointAsMillis` which is similarly in name and function to `NumberFieldMapper.NumberType`'s `parsePoint` except that it normalizes to milliseconds which is what aggs need at the moment. Closes elastic#53168
|
Pinging @elastic/es-analytics-geo (:Analytics/Aggregations) |
nik9000
added a commit
to nik9000/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2020
It looks like `date_nanos` fields weren't likely to work properly in composite aggs because composites iterate field values using points and we weren't converting the points into milliseconds. Because the doc values were coming back in milliseconds we ended up geting very confused and just never collecting sub-aggregations. This fixes that by adding a method to `DateFieldMapper.Resolution` to `parsePointAsMillis` which is similarly in name and function to `NumberFieldMapper.NumberType`'s `parsePoint` except that it normalizes to milliseconds which is what aggs need at the moment. Closes elastic#53168
nik9000
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2020
It looks like `date_nanos` fields weren't likely to work properly in composite aggs because composites iterate field values using points and we weren't converting the points into milliseconds. Because the doc values were coming back in milliseconds we ended up geting very confused and just never collecting sub-aggregations. This fixes that by adding a method to `DateFieldMapper.Resolution` to `parsePointAsMillis` which is similarly in name and function to `NumberFieldMapper.NumberType`'s `parsePoint` except that it normalizes to milliseconds which is what aggs need at the moment. Closes #53168
nik9000
added a commit
to nik9000/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2020
Now that we've backported elastic#53315 we can run the backwards compatibility tests against it.
nik9000
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2020
Now that we've backported #53315 we can run the backwards compatibility tests against it.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It looks like
date_nanosfields weren't likely to work properly incomposite aggs because composites iterate field values using points and
we weren't converting the points into milliseconds. Because the doc
values were coming back in milliseconds we ended up geting very confused
and just never collecting sub-aggregations.
This fixes that by adding a method to
DateFieldMapper.ResolutiontoparsePointAsMilliswhich is similarly in name and function toNumberFieldMapper.NumberType'sparsePointexcept that it normalizesto milliseconds which is what aggs need at the moment.
Closes #53168