Monitoring should wait with collecting data when cluster service is started #48277
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tarted.
Otherwise integration tests may fail if the monitoring interval is low:
```
[2019-10-21T09:57:25,527][ERROR][o.e.b.ElasticsearchUncaughtExceptionHandler] [integTest-0] fatal error in thread [elasticsearch[integTest-0][generic][T#4]], exiting
java.lang.AssertionError: initial cluster state not set yet
at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.ClusterApplierService.state(ClusterApplierService.java:208) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT]
at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.ClusterService.state(ClusterService.java:125) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT]
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.monitoring.MonitoringService$MonitoringExecution$1.doRun(MonitoringService.java:231) ~[?:?]
at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.AbstractRunnable.run(AbstractRunnable.java:37) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT]
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) ~[?:?]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) ~[?:?]
at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.ThreadContext$ContextPreservingRunnable.run(ThreadContext.java:703) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128) ~[?:?]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) ~[?:?]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:835) [?:?]
```
I ran into this when lowering the monitoring interval when investigating
enrich monitoring test: elastic#48258
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (:Core/Features/Monitoring) |
|
@elasticmachine update branch |
|
@elasticmachine update branch |
martijnvg
added a commit
to martijnvg/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2019
…tarted. (elastic#48277) Otherwise integration tests may fail if the monitoring interval is low: ``` [2019-10-21T09:57:25,527][ERROR][o.e.b.ElasticsearchUncaughtExceptionHandler] [integTest-0] fatal error in thread [elasticsearch[integTest-0][generic][T#4]], exiting java.lang.AssertionError: initial cluster state not set yet at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.ClusterApplierService.state(ClusterApplierService.java:208) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT] at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.ClusterService.state(ClusterService.java:125) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT] at org.elasticsearch.xpack.monitoring.MonitoringService$MonitoringExecution$1.doRun(MonitoringService.java:231) ~[?:?] at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.AbstractRunnable.run(AbstractRunnable.java:37) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT] at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) ~[?:?] at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) ~[?:?] at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.ThreadContext$ContextPreservingRunnable.run(ThreadContext.java:703) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128) ~[?:?] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) ~[?:?] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:835) [?:?] ``` I ran into this when lowering the monitoring interval when investigating enrich monitoring test: elastic#48258
martijnvg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2019
…tarted. (#49426) Backport of #48277 Otherwise integration tests may fail if the monitoring interval is low: ``` [2019-10-21T09:57:25,527][ERROR][o.e.b.ElasticsearchUncaughtExceptionHandler] [integTest-0] fatal error in thread [elasticsearch[integTest-0][generic][T#4]], exiting java.lang.AssertionError: initial cluster state not set yet at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.ClusterApplierService.state(ClusterApplierService.java:208) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT] at org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.ClusterService.state(ClusterService.java:125) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT] at org.elasticsearch.xpack.monitoring.MonitoringService$MonitoringExecution$1.doRun(MonitoringService.java:231) ~[?:?] at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.AbstractRunnable.run(AbstractRunnable.java:37) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT] at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) ~[?:?] at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) ~[?:?] at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.ThreadContext$ContextPreservingRunnable.run(ThreadContext.java:703) ~[elasticsearch-7.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.6.0-SNAPSHOT] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128) ~[?:?] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) ~[?:?] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:835) [?:?] ``` I ran into this when lowering the monitoring interval when investigating enrich monitoring test: #48258
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Otherwise integration tests may fail if the monitoring interval is low:
I ran into this when lowering the monitoring interval when investigating
enrich monitoring test: #48258