Explicitly include user identifiers in related.user field description
#1420
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@elastic/security-external-integrations Any feedback for or against expanding |
kgeller
approved these changes
May 18, 2021
…elated-user-description
ebeahan
added a commit
to ebeahan/ecs
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2021
…on (elastic#1420) * explicitly include user identifiers in description * update artifacts * changelog # Conflicts: # experimental/generated/csv/fields.csv # generated/csv/fields.csv
ebeahan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2021
rylnd
added a commit
to rylnd/ecs
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2021
* master: Stage 2 changes for RFC 0018 - extending the `threat.*` field set (elastic#1438) Remove deprecated `host.user.*` fields (elastic#1439) Explicitly include user identifiers in `related.user` field description (elastic#1420) Set the merge date on RFC 0018 stage 2 (elastic#1429) [RFC] Extend Threat Fieldset - Stage 2 Proposal (elastic#1395) [Tooling] Add --exclude flag to Generator to support field removal testing (elastic#1411) Add `host.user.*` deprecation notice in field reuse description (elastic#1422) Stage 2 changes for RFC 0015 - `elf` header (elastic#1410) Stage 3 changes for RFC 0012 - `orchestrator` field set (elastic#1417) Support `match_only_text` in Go code generator (elastic#1418) Stage 3 Orchestrator RFC (elastic#1343) moving into folder (elastic#1416) removing use-cases (elastic#1405) removing --oss (elastic#1404) Set the merge date on RFC 0015 stage 2 (elastic#1409) Consolidate `Breaking changes` sections in `CHANGELOG.next` (elastic#1408) RFC-Stage-0: Proposal to add a "ticket" schema / field definition to ECS (elastic#1383) [RFC] `match_only_text` type migration - Stage 0 (elastic#1396) Client port is wrongly documented (elastic#1402) (elastic#1406)
6 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Capturing user identifiers in addition to user names in
related.usercan be useful, but the description forrelated.userimplies the field is limited to only "user names".Here's one instance where pivoting around the user's SID from one event helps track that SID back to a user name in another: #779 (comment)
Expanding the description for
related.useralso aligns with the description forrelated.hosts, specifying both "hostnames and other host identifiers".Closes #1355