test(snap): add snap CI workflow

[MonicaisHer]

The workflow added here will activate only after it has been merged into the main. In the meantime, MonicaisHer#1 that is against the fork can be taken as a reference.

Signed-off-by: Mengyi Wang mengyi.wang@canonical.com

If your build fails due to your commit message not passing the build checks, please review the guidelines here: https://github.com/edgexfoundry/device-rfid-llrp-go/blob/main/.github/Contributing.md

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• I am not introducing a breaking change (if you are, flag in conventional commit message with BREAKING CHANGE: describing the break)
• I am not introducing a new dependency (add notes below if you are)
• I have added unit tests for the new feature or bug fix (if not, why?)
• I have fully tested (add details below) this the new feature or bug fix (if not, why?) add CI workflow local MonicaisHer/device-rfid-llrp-go#1
• I have opened a PR for the related docs change (if not, why?)

Testing Instructions

New Dependency Instructions (If applicable)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #73 (19c372e) into main (e0db465) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #73      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.11%   41.08%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        9016     9016              
==========================================
- Hits         3707     3704       -3     
- Misses       4141     4142       +1     
- Partials     1168     1170       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
internal/llrp/reader.go	40.13% <0.00%> (-0.67%)	⬇️
internal/retry/retry.go	93.12% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e0db465...19c372e. Read the comment docs.

[farshidtz]

Thanks. Looks good.