Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: New tbl_file() and tbl_query() to explicitly access tables and queries as dbplyr lazy tables #96

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2024

Conversation

krlmlr
Copy link
Collaborator

@krlmlr krlmlr commented Mar 3, 2024

Related: #38.

@krlmlr krlmlr force-pushed the f-38-tbl-query branch 2 times, most recently from 3452175 to 8bdfe33 Compare March 3, 2024 11:23
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.87%. Comparing base (71ff5b1) to head (2de7ff6).

❗ Current head 2de7ff6 differs from pull request most recent head 3b415d8. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3b415d8 to get more accurate results

Files Patch % Lines
R/backend-dbplyr__duckdb_connection.R 60.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #96      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.94%   85.87%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         106      106              
  Lines        3621     3631      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         3112     3118       +6     
- Misses        509      513       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@krlmlr krlmlr merged commit a023912 into main Mar 3, 2024
18 checks passed
@krlmlr krlmlr deleted the f-38-tbl-query branch March 3, 2024 16:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants