Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update README.md #767

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 29, 2024
Merged

Update README.md #767

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
84abb30
Update README.md
cwmeijer May 16, 2024
03a01e9
Update README.md
cwmeijer May 22, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions tutorials/README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -78,9 +78,11 @@ Also the main conclusions (🠊) from the thesis (on images and text) about the
| $p_{keep}$ | **optimized** (*i*, *txt*), **$0.5$** (*ts*) | $0.1$| $0.1$ | default | $0.1$| $0.1$|
| $n_{features}$ |**$8$** | $6$ |default | default | default | $16$ |

🠊 The most crucial parameter is $p_{keep}$. Lower values of $p_{keep}$ lead to more sentitive explanations (observed for both images and text).
🠊 The most crucial parameter is $p_{keep}$. Lower values of $p_{keep}$ lead to more sentitive explanations (observed for both images and text). Easier classificication tasks usually require a lower $p_keep$ as this will cause more perturbation in the input and therefore a more distinct signal in the model predictions.

🠊 The feature resolution $n_{features}$ exhibited an optimum at a value of $6$.
🠊 The feature resolution $n_{features}$ exhibited an optimum at a value of $6$. Higher values can offer a finer grained result but require (far) more $n_masks$. This is also dependent on the scale of the phenomena in the input data that we want to take into account in the explanation.

🠊 Larger $n_masks$ will return more consistent results at the cost of computation time. If 2 identical runs yield (very) different results, these will likely contain a lot of (or even mostly) noise and a higher value for $n_masks$ should be used instead.

#### LIME
| Hyperparameter | Default value | <img width="20" alt="LeafSnap30 Logo" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3244249/151539100-dbdfe0f8-485f-45d4-a249-a1f79e970066.png"> (*i*) |<img width="25" alt="Weather Logo" src="https://github.com/dianna-ai/dianna/assets/3244249/3ff3d639-ed2f-4a38-b7ac-957c984bce9f"> (*ts*)| <img width="25" alt="Coffe Logo" src="https://github.com/dianna-ai/dianna/assets/3244249/9ab50a0f-5da3-41d2-80e9-70d2c8769162">(*ts*)|
Expand Down
Loading