refactor(distribution)!: add cometinfo #20588
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes to the Cosmos SDK involve integrating a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant SimApp
participant DistrKeeper
participant CometService
User->>SimApp: Initialize NewSimApp
SimApp->>DistrKeeper: Initialize with CometService
DistrKeeper->>CometService: Access consensus-related info
CometService-->>DistrKeeper: Provide info
DistrKeeper-->>SimApp: Initialized
SimApp-->>User: SimApp ready
sequenceDiagram
participant Test
participant Keeper
participant CometService
Test->>Keeper: Initialize with TestCometService
Keeper->>CometService: Access consensus-related info
CometService-->>Keeper: Provide info
Keeper-->>Test: Test execution
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://github.com/avatars/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://github.com/avatars/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
x/distribution/keeper/abci.go (1)
15-15: The TODO comment should be updated or removed sincecontext.Contextis now being used.x/distribution/CHANGELOG.md (1)
35-35: Consider rephrasing to avoid wordiness: "now usescometServiceto access consensus-related information."Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~35-~35: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness. (IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)
Context: ...x/distributionnow takes cometService in order to get consensus related information. * [#...
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/distribution/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/distribution/CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
- x/distribution/depinject.go (3 hunks)
- x/distribution/keeper/abci.go (2 hunks)
- x/distribution/keeper/allocation_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go (9 hunks)
- x/distribution/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
- x/distribution/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/distribution/migrations/v4/migrate_funds_test.go (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (10)
x/distribution/keeper/abci.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/distribution/depinject.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/distribution/migrations/v4/migrate_funds_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/distribution/CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"x/distribution/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/distribution/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/distribution/keeper/allocation_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"simapp/app.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.tests/integration/distribution/keeper/msg_server_test.go (3)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
LanguageTool
x/distribution/CHANGELOG.md
[style] ~35-~35: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness. (IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)
Context: ...x/distributionnow takes cometService in order to get consensus related information. * [#...
Markdownlint
x/distribution/CHANGELOG.md
37-37: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
38-38: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
41-41: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
43-43: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
45-45: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
47-47: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
49-49: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
52-52: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
54-54: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
34-34: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank lines
Additional comments not posted (23)
x/distribution/keeper/abci.go (4)
4-5: Ensure the new importcontextis used consistently throughout the file.
21-21: The integration ofcometServiceis crucial for fetching consensus-related information. Ensure thatCometInfois correctly implemented and used.
34-34: This logic for sending coins from the decimal pool to the community pool every 1000 blocks is clear and well-implemented.
42-42: The use ofsdk.ConsAddressfor the proposer address is appropriate. Ensure thatPreviousProposer.Sethandles errors internally as expected.x/distribution/depinject.go (3)
6-6: The import ofcometis correctly placed and necessary for the changes in this file.
34-34: The addition ofCometServicetoModuleInputsis crucial for the integration of the new service. Ensure that all modules usingModuleInputsare aware of this new dependency.
74-74: The inclusion ofCometServicein theNewKeeperfunction is well-implemented. Ensure that theCometServiceis properly initialized before this point to avoid runtime errors.x/distribution/migrations/v4/migrate_funds_test.go (3)
10-10: The import ofcometis necessary for the new functionality being tested. Ensure that it is used correctly in the tests.
35-41: TheemptyCometServicestruct and its methodCometInfoare well-defined for testing purposes. Ensure that this mock implementation aligns with the actualcomet.Serviceinterface.
101-101: The use ofemptyCometServicein theNewKeeperfunction within the test setup is appropriate. This ensures that the tests do not depend on external services.x/distribution/CHANGELOG.md (1)
34-34: The indentation in the changelog should be consistent. Adjust the unordered list items to have a consistent indentation of 2 spaces.- * remove `Keeper`: `IterateValidatorOutstandingRewards`, `GetValidatorOutstandingRewards`, `SetValidatorOutstandingRewards`, `DeleteValidatorOutstandingRewards` + * remove `Keeper`: `IterateValidatorOutstandingRewards`, `GetValidatorOutstandingRewards`, `SetValidatorOutstandingRewards`, `DeleteValidatorOutstandingRewards`Also applies to: 37-37, 38-38, 41-41, 43-43, 45-45, 47-47, 49-49, 52-52, 54-54
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Tools
Markdownlint
34-34: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank linesx/distribution/keeper/keeper.go (1)
25-25: The addition ofcometServiceto theKeeperstruct and its initialization inNewKeeperare correctly implemented. EnsurecometServiceis utilized appropriately in the module's operations.Also applies to: 63-80
Verification successful
The
cometServiceis utilized appropriately in the module's operations, including inBeginBlockerfunctions and module initializations.
x/slashing/module.gox/evidence/module.gox/distribution/keeper/keeper.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `cometService` is used appropriately within the module. # Test: Search for `cometService` usage in the module. Expect: Usage in logical places. rg --type go $'cometService' | grep -v 'NewKeeper'Length of output: 1872
x/distribution/keeper/allocation_test.go (1)
32-42: The addition oftestCometServiceacross various test functions is appropriate for simulating the behavior of the newcometService. Verify thattestCometServiceis correctly used in scenarios that depend on comet-related logic.Also applies to: 73-73, 140-140, 281-281
simapp/app.go (1)
360-360: Ensure thatcometServiceis properly initialized before its usage indistrkeeper.NewKeeper.Verification successful
The initialization of
cometServiceis properly handled before its usage in thedistrkeeper.NewKeeperfunction call.
cometServiceis initialized usingruntime.NewContextAwareCometInfoService()insimapp/app.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization of `cometService` before its usage. # Test: Search for the initialization of `cometService`. Expect: Initialization before its usage. rg --type go --before-context=10 'cometService := runtime.NewContextAwareCometInfoService()'Length of output: 1472
tests/integration/distribution/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)
140-140: EnsurecometServiceis properly initialized before passing todistrkeeper.NewKeeper.Verification successful
The
cometServiceis properly initialized usingruntime.NewContextAwareCometInfoService()before being passed todistrkeeper.NewKeeper.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `cometService` is initialized before its usage in `distrkeeper.NewKeeper`. # Test: Search for the initialization of `cometService`. Expect: Initialization before its usage. rg --type go --context 5 'NewContextAwareCometInfoService' tests/integration/distribution/keeper/msg_server_test.goLength of output: 1035
x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go (8)
288-288: Confirm thattestCometServiceis consistently used across all test setups.Verification successful
The search results indicate that
testCometServiceis used in multiple test files, includingkeeper_test.go,delegation_test.go, andallocation_test.go. To confirm consistent usage, we need to ensure thattestCometServiceis used in the context of test setups across these files.Let's review the context of
testCometServiceusage in these files to confirm consistency.
The context around the usage of
testCometServicein the test files indicates that it is consistently used as part of the test setup across different test cases. The pattern of usage is similar in all instances, suggesting thattestCometServiceis indeed consistently used across all test setups.
keeper_test.go:testCometServiceis included in the setup parameters.delegation_test.go:testCometServiceis repeatedly included in the setup parameters.allocation_test.go:testCometServiceis defined and used in the setup parameters.This confirms that
testCometServiceis consistently used across all test setups.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm consistent usage of `testCometService` across all test setups. # Test: Search for inconsistent usage of `testCometService`. Expect: Consistent usage across all tests. rg --type go 'testCometService' | rg -v 'NewKeeper'Length of output: 923
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Review the context of `testCometService` usage in test files to confirm consistency. # Extract lines around the usage of `testCometService` to understand its context. rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'testCometService' x/distribution/keeper/keeper_test.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'testCometService' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'testCometService' x/distribution/keeper/allocation_test.goLength of output: 2678
171-171: Verify thattestCometServiceis correctly passed and utilized within theNewKeeperfunction.
910-910: Check the reusability oftestCometServicein multiple withdrawal scenarios.
1125-1125: Examine the effects oftestCometServiceon 100% commission reward calculations.Verification successful
The context around
testCometServicein the identified files does not show any direct impact on 100% commission reward calculations. The tests primarily focus on setting up thedistrKeeperand resetting the fee pool, with no specific logic tied to 100% commission rewards.
x/distribution/keeper/keeper_test.gox/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.gox/distribution/keeper/allocation_test.goGiven the absence of any direct or indirect references to 100% commission reward calculations in the context of
testCometService, it appears thattestCometServicedoes not affect these calculations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the effects of `testCometService` on 100% commission reward calculations. # Test: Search for effects on 100% commission calculations due to `testCometService`. Expect: No adverse effects. rg --type go 'testCometService' | rg 'Test100PercentCommissionReward'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the effects of `testCometService` on 100% commission reward calculations. # Step 1: Search for all occurrences of `testCometService` in the codebase. rg --type go 'testCometService' # Step 2: Search for all test functions related to 100% commission reward calculations. rg --type go '100% commission' --context 10Length of output: 951
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the context around `testCometService` in the identified files to verify its effects on 100% commission reward calculations. # Step 1: Extract and display the context around `testCometService` in the identified files. rg --type go 'testCometService' -A 10 -B 10Length of output: 20140
756-756: Validate the integration oftestCometServicein complex multi-slash scenarios.
626-626: Ensure thattestCometServicedoes not interfere with the handling of slashes in the same block.Verification successful
The search results indicate that
testCometServiceis defined inx/distribution/keeper/allocation_test.goand used in multiple test files, includingx/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go. TheSlashValidatorfunction is defined inx/distribution/testutil/staking_helper.goand used inx/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go.Given that both
testCometServiceandSlashValidatorare used inx/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go, we need to ensure that their usages do not interfere with each other.To verify this, we should inspect the specific lines in
x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.gowhere bothtestCometServiceandSlashValidatorare used to check for any potential interference.
The search results show multiple instances of both
testCometServiceandSlashValidatorinx/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go. However, the lines provided do not give enough context to determine if there is any interference between them.To ensure there is no interference, we need to extract and review the surrounding code for these instances. This will help us understand the context in which
testCometServiceandSlashValidatorare used.
The extracted surrounding code for both
testCometServiceandSlashValidatorinx/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.goshows that they are used in different contexts and do not interfere with each other.testCometServiceis part of the setup for various tests, whileSlashValidatoris used within specific test cases to simulate slashing a validator.There is no evidence of direct interference between
testCometServiceand the handling of slashes bySlashValidator.
- Instances of
testCometServiceare primarily used in the setup phase of the tests.- Instances of
SlashValidatorare used within the test cases to simulate slashing.Based on this analysis, it is safe to conclude that
testCometServicedoes not interfere with the handling of slashes in the same block.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure that `testCometService` does not interfere with the handling of slashes in the same block. # Test: Search for interference in slash handling due to `testCometService`. Expect: No interference. rg --type go 'testCometService' | rg 'SlashValidator'Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather detailed information about `testCometService` and `SlashValidator` to ensure there is no interference. # Step 1: Find the definition and all usages of `testCometService`. echo "Searching for the definition and usages of testCometService..." rg --type go 'testCometService' # Step 2: Find the definition and all usages of `SlashValidator`. echo "Searching for the definition and usages of SlashValidator..." rg --type go 'SlashValidator'Length of output: 2050
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect specific lines in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go` where both `testCometService` and `SlashValidator` are used to check for any potential interference. # Step 1: Extract lines where `testCometService` is used in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`. echo "Extracting lines where testCometService is used in x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go..." rg --type go 'testCometService' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go # Step 2: Extract lines where `SlashValidator` is used in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`. echo "Extracting lines where SlashValidator is used in x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go..." rg --type go 'SlashValidator' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.goLength of output: 984
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and review the surrounding code for instances of `testCometService` and `SlashValidator` in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go` to check for any potential interference. # Step 1: Extract 5 lines before and after each instance of `testCometService` in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`. echo "Extracting surrounding code for instances of testCometService in x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go..." rg --type go -C 5 'testCometService' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go # Step 2: Extract 5 lines before and after each instance of `SlashValidator` in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`. echo "Extracting surrounding code for instances of SlashValidator in x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go..." rg --type go -C 5 'SlashValidator' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.goLength of output: 4371
426-426: Check for potential side effects oftestCometServicein multi-delegator scenarios.Verification successful
The
testCometServiceis defined as an instance ofemptyCometService, which is a struct with minimal implementation. Specifically, theCometInfomethod ofemptyCometServicereturns an emptycomet.Infostruct, indicating that it likely serves as a mock or placeholder service.Given this context, it appears that
testCometServiceis used in tests without any significant side effects, as it does not perform any substantial operations.
emptyCometServiceis defined in:
x/distribution/migrations/v4/migrate_funds_test.gox/distribution/keeper/allocation_test.go
testCometServiceis used in multiple test files, including:
x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.gox/distribution/keeper/keeper_test.gox/distribution/keeper/allocation_test.goBased on the analysis, there are no apparent side effects of
testCometServicein multi-delegator scenarios.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential side effects of `testCometService` in multi-delegator test scenarios. # Test: Search for side effects in multi-delegator tests. Expect: No adverse effects due to `testCometService`. rg --type go 'testCometService' | rg 'TestCalculateRewardsMultiDelegator'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search to identify all multi-delegator test scenarios and check for the usage of `testCometService`. # Step 1: Identify all test functions that involve multi-delegator scenarios. rg --type go 'func Test.*MultiDelegator' -l | xargs -I {} sh -c 'echo {}; rg "testCometService" {}' # Step 2: Check if `testCometService` is used within these tests. # This step is combined with the previous one to streamline the process.Length of output: 324
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and analyze the relevant code sections involving `testCometService` in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`. # Step 1: Extract lines involving `testCometService` in the identified file. rg --type go 'testCometService' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 1438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and analyze the definition and implementation of `testCometService`. # Step 1: Locate the definition of `testCometService`. rg --type go 'testCometService := ' -A 10 # Step 2: Locate the implementation details if it's a function or struct. rg --type go 'func testCometService' -A 20 rg --type go 'type testCometService' -A 20Length of output: 133
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search to locate any references or definitions of `testCometService` across the entire codebase. # Step 1: Search for any references to `testCometService` across the entire codebase. rg --type go 'testCometService' # Step 2: Search for potential import statements that might define `testCometService`. rg --type go 'import' -A 5 | rg 'testCometService'Length of output: 954
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and analyze the implementation of `emptyCometService`. # Step 1: Locate the definition of `emptyCometService`. rg --type go 'type emptyCometService' -A 20 # Step 2: Locate the implementation details if it's a function or struct. rg --type go 'func emptyCometService' -A 20Length of output: 3653
537-537: Assess the impact oftestCometServiceon basic reward withdrawal operations.
| @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ func initFixture(t *testing.T) *fixture { | |||
| }, | |||
| }, | |||
| }, | |||
| ProposerAddress: valConsAddr, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The addition of ProposerAddress is not followed by any further usage or assertions in the test suite. This indicates that the new field might not be utilized correctly.
- Ensure that
ProposerAddressis properly handled and validated in the test suite.
Analysis chain
Addition of ProposerAddress to the context is a significant change. Ensure that this new field is utilized correctly throughout the test suite.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that `ProposerAddress` is utilized correctly in the test suite.
# Test: Search for the usage of `ProposerAddress`. Expect: Proper handling and assertions related to this field.
rg --type go 'ProposerAddress' tests/integration/distribution/keeper/msg_server_test.go
Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that `ProposerAddress` is utilized correctly throughout the test suite.
# Test: Search for the usage of `ProposerAddress` across the entire test suite. Expect: Proper handling and assertions related to this field.
rg --type go 'ProposerAddress' tests/integration/distribution/keeper/
Length of output: 158
| if ctx.BlockHeight() > 1 { | ||
| if err := k.AllocateTokens(ctx, previousTotalPower, ctx.CometInfo().LastCommit.Votes); err != nil { | ||
| if header.Height > 1 { | ||
| if err := k.AllocateTokens(ctx, previousTotalPower, ci.LastCommit.Votes); err != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The error handling here is appropriate, but consider adding telemetry or logging to capture the error details for better observability.
| @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ func initFixture(t *testing.T) (sdk.Context, []sdk.AccAddress, keeper.Keeper, de | |||
| bankKeeper, | |||
| stakingKeeper, | |||
| poolKeeper, | |||
| testCometService, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The integration of testCometService in initFixture is not consistently applied across all instances. Specifically, the following files need attention:
x/feegrant/keeper/genesis_test.gox/circuit/keeper/keeper_test.gox/circuit/keeper/query_test.gox/circuit/keeper/msg_server_test.gox/circuit/ante/circuit_test.gotests/integration/staking/keeper/genesis_test.gotests/integration/staking/keeper/vote_extensions_test.gotests/integration/staking/keeper/validator_test.gotests/integration/staking/keeper/slash_test.gotests/integration/staking/keeper/unbonding_test.gotests/integration/staking/keeper/msg_server_test.gotests/integration/staking/keeper/grpc_query_test.gotests/integration/staking/keeper/common_test.gotests/integration/staking/keeper/delegation_test.gotests/integration/runtime/query_test.gotests/integration/slashing/keeper/keeper_test.gotests/integration/gov/keeper/tally_test.gotests/integration/gov/keeper/grpc_query_test.gotests/integration/gov/keeper/keeper_test.gotests/integration/distribution/keeper/msg_server_test.gotests/integration/distribution/keeper/grpc_query_test.gotests/integration/evidence/keeper/infraction_test.gotests/integration/auth/keeper/msg_server_test.gocollections/genesis_test.goclient/v2/autocli/query_test.goclient/v2/autocli/msg_test.goclient/v2/autocli/common_test.go
Ensure these files are updated to include the testCometService parameter in the initFixture function.
Analysis chain
The integration of testCometService in initFixture aligns with the PR's objective to incorporate cometService. Ensure all dependent tests are updated to handle this new parameter.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all tests using `initFixture` have been updated to include `testCometService`.
# Test: Search for the function usage without the new parameter. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type go $'initFixture\(' | grep -v 'testCometService'
Length of output: 9095
| @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ func TestCalculateRewardsBasic(t *testing.T) { | |||
| bankKeeper, | |||
| stakingKeeper, | |||
| poolKeeper, | |||
| testCometService, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The testCometService is used in x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go but is not initialized or imported within this file. It is defined and initialized in x/distribution/keeper/allocation_test.go. This indicates that testCometService is not properly initialized before use in delegation_test.go.
- Ensure
testCometServiceis properly initialized inx/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go.
Analysis chain
Ensure testCometService is properly initialized before use in tests.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that `testCometService` is properly initialized in all test functions where it's used.
# Test: Search for the initialization of `testCometService`. Expect: Initialization before use in each test function.
rg --type go 'testCometService ='
Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that `testCometService` is properly initialized in the test file `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`.
# Test: Search for the initialization of `testCometService` in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`.
rg --type go 'testCometService =' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage and initialization of `testCometService` in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`.
# Test: Search for the usage of `testCometService` in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`.
rg --type go 'testCometService' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go
# Test: Search for the initialization of `testCometService` in setup functions or imports in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`.
rg --type go 'func.*setup' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go
rg --type go 'import' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go
Length of output: 394
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the import of `testCometService` in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`.
# Test: Search for the import of `testCometService` in `x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go`.
rg --type go 'testCometService' x/distribution/keeper/delegation_test.go
Length of output: 252
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definition of `testCometService` in the codebase.
# Test: Search for the definition of `testCometService` in the codebase.
rg --type go 'var testCometService'
Length of output: 122
Description
add cometinfo to distribution
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
cometServiceintegration for enhanced consensus-related information handling.Bug Fixes
BeginBlockerfunction to improve context handling.Tests
testCometServiceparameter to various test functions for better test coverage.Documentation
x/distributionmodule documentation to reflect new method arguments and requirements.Refactor
cometService.