Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

podman-remote,bindings: trim context path correctly when its emptydir #16810

Merged

Conversation

flouthoc
Copy link
Collaborator

@flouthoc flouthoc commented Dec 12, 2022

podman-remote converts and sends absolute path as context when its an emptydir by adding additional seperator however it should correctly trim the path and not add additional seperator for such use cases.

Closes: BZ#2145054

podman-remote,bindings: trim context path correctly when its `emptydir`

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 12, 2022
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Dec 12, 2022

LGTM

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

Still fighting with some tests on this one @flouthoc

@flouthoc flouthoc force-pushed the trim-path-correctly branch 2 times, most recently from df69165 to dfddda9 Compare December 30, 2022 12:17
podman-remote converts and sends absolute path as context when its an
emptydir by adding additional seperator however it should correctly trim
the path and not add additional seperator for such use cases.

Closes: BZ#2145054

Signed-off-by: Aditya R <arajan@redhat.com>
@flouthoc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@TomSweeneyRedHat Passes now.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Dec 31, 2022

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 2, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 2, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: flouthoc, vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 94c9251 into containers:main Jan 2, 2023
edsantiago added a commit to edsantiago/libpod that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2023
July 2022: test was flaking on new VM images. We needed new
images, so I filed containers#15014 and skipped the test.

January 2023: no attention from anyone, so I'll try bumping up
a dd timeout from 10s to 30s. But in the interim, the test
has broken: it used to expect "Containerfile" in output (this
was deliberately added in containers#13655)... but containers#16810 changed that
so Containerfile no longer appears. @flouthoc argues that
this too is deliberate (containers#17059). Okay, so let's change the
test then. All I care about is not adding more regressions.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 16, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 16, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants