Running code-format for dqm

[cmsbuild]

Applying code-format for CMSSW category dqm.
See the build logs here https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/GitHub-refactor-cmssw-module/206//console

cms-bot has successfully run the following:

• scram build code-checks-all
• scram build code-format-all
• scram build

[cmsbuild]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26745/9736

• This PR adds an extra 8KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/149/console Started: 2019/05/10 17:16

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/EcalMonitorTasks
DQM/HcalTasks
DQM/SiPixelPhase1Track
DQM/SiStripCommissioningClients
DQM/SiStripMonitorHardware
Validation/MuonHits
Validation/RecoVertex

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@erikbutz, @DryRun, @hdelanno, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @argiro, @fioriNTU, @deguio, @jandrea, @mtosi, @idebruyn, @ebrondol, @VinInn, @threus, @dgulhan, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: ad1ff36
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1b4be4/149/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1b4be4/149/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-1b4be4/11624.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2021_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2021+RecoFull_2021+HARVESTFull_2021+ALCAFull_2021

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 7 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3211964
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 133
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211627
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 204
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
• Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

[jfernan2]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

+1

[DryRun]

Hi, will this be backported to 10_6_X? I would like to make a backport of #26941, but it can't be merged into 10_6_X because of these changes.

[fabiocos]

@DryRun in general no, we are not going to massively backport whatever code-format change. I think that dedicated cases will have to be managed ad hoc.

[DryRun]

@fabiocos OK, thanks. Could I ask how I should proceed in this case? I.e. how to pull the code-format changes for a single file?

[fabiocos]

@DryRun not sure about what you are exactly trying to do, in any case you may just checkout from the master only the modified file you are interested in and update that one.