Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary pragmas #249

Merged

Conversation

fwyzard
Copy link

@fwyzard fwyzard commented Jan 17, 2019

#pragma unroll is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports #pragma GCC unroll N which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the #pragma unroll there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.

`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
@fwyzard
Copy link
Author

fwyzard commented Jan 17, 2019

No observable impact on the performance: 1868.2 ± 3.8 ev/s (before) vs 1870.8 ± 5.4 ev/s (after).

@fwyzard fwyzard merged commit 6218478 into cms-patatrack:CMSSW_10_4_X_Patatrack Jan 17, 2019
@fwyzard fwyzard deleted the patatrack_remove_unroll branch January 17, 2019 07:32
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2020
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2020
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2020
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2020
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2020
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2020
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2020
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2020
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2020
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2021
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2021
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
fwyzard added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2021
`#pragma unroll` is not supported by GCC, leading to compilation
warnings in host code.
GCC 8 supports `#pragma GCC unroll N` which could be used instead.

However, benchmarking on a V100 with and without the `#pragma unroll`
there is no observable difference, so it is simpler to remove them.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant