-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Combine needs a mass value for the signal process #1
Comments
Just to check I understand the issue (also reported by @thomas-mueller): the problem is purely on the CH side, in that it requires signal processes to have a valid numeric mass value to write a datacard? This then has to be passed to text2workspace with -m. What we want is a way to write signal processes without the $MASS pattern. Is that correct or is there another problem? |
Ah yes, it is only that - so yes, we want a way to write signal processes without the $MASS pattern. |
@adewit @ffrensch @thomas-mueller |
Great! This works fine :-) |
Added wrapper for AddWorkspace and ExtractPdfs
Width interpolation updates and standard flow
…18-dev fixing physics model. removeing stuff not needed. using degrees for a…
Local mss mtt2017
Adding an option to have JEC uncertanties split into sources
Update from Albert
update the TH1F constructor
FR systematics
Speedup combine submission
For some limit calculation methods, combine needs the signal process to have a mass value specified in the shape file. CH currently lets you make a datacard + shape file without mass value, if this is done it would be nice to assign the signal process a dummy mass value so that the datacard can be used with all combine methods.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: