Upgrade Labs Process Doc #2438
Closed
Upgrade Labs Process Doc #2438
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Clinton Wolfe <clintoncwolfe@gmail.com>
|
Deploy preview for chef-web-docs ready! Built with commit 5923d64 |
Signed-off-by: Clinton Wolfe <clintoncwolfe@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Clinton Wolfe <clintoncwolfe@gmail.com>
clintoncwolfe
commented
Apr 28, 2020
Comment on lines
+382
to
+390
| ├── cookbooks | ||
| │ ├── some-cookbook/ | ||
| │ └── another-cookbook/ | ||
| ├── habitat | ||
| │ ├── default.toml | ||
| │ └── plan.sh | ||
| ├── policyfiles | ||
| │ └── my-policy.rb | ||
| └── .kitchen.yml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These ASCII graphics symbols fail the docs linter process. Should I use lower-end ASCII (like pipe, plus, etc?) or replace with an image, or is there another suggestion for representing directory trees?
10 tasks
|
Closing, as this will live in the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Clinton Wolfe clintoncwolfe@gmail.com
Description
This is a rough draft of the "Upgrade Labs Process Doc," which describes how to upgrade a Chef Infra node from to Effortless for any prior process. We're not sure where the docs fits in yet on the site, and the process itself is slightly still in flux. Hence, currently a draft.
Definition of Done
Issues Resolved
chef/chef-workstation#1121
[List any existing issues this PR resolves, or any Discourse or
StackOverflow discussion that's relevant]
Check List