Optimize split_vault_keys method for large bag #364
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
With 10k secrets the regexp union is quite big and applying it to the 20k keys takes around 2 minutes... Also the Regexp was too greedy and could match normal items as sparse one. Signed-off-by: Baptiste Courtois <b.courtois@criteo.com>
tas50
added
the
Expeditor: Bump Version Minor
10 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With 10k secrets the regexp union is quite big and applying it to
the 20k keys takes around 2 minutes...
Also the Regexp was too greedy and could match normal items as sparse
one.
This is a copy of #362 without the style fixes
Signed-off-by: Baptiste Courtois b.courtois@criteo.com