Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: ECS ci/cd #251

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 13, 2022
Merged

chore: ECS ci/cd #251

merged 11 commits into from
May 13, 2022

Conversation

ebezzi
Copy link
Member

@ebezzi ebezzi commented May 6, 2022

Reviewers

Functional:

Readability:


Changes

  • add
  • remove
  • modify

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 6, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #251 (a264a20) into main (78f36b5) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #251   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.12%   76.12%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines        6660     6660           
=======================================
  Hits         5070     5070           
  Misses       1590     1590           
Flag Coverage Δ
frontend 76.12% <ø> (ø)
javascript 76.12% <ø> (ø)
unitTest 76.12% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 78f36b5...a264a20. Read the comment docs.

@ebezzi ebezzi changed the title WIP: ECS ci/cd chore: ECS ci/cd May 6, 2022
happy_version: "0.17.0"
create-tag: "true"
env: ${{ env.DEPLOYMENT_STAGE }}
# TODO: Uncomment if you want Slack notification
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe later, to avoid spamming the channel with noise. Also, will require to add the SLACK_TOKEN to the secrets.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if you remove this code for now (instead of commenting it out) and create a ticket to add slack notifications for portal deployment. You could add the cde on line 62-69 there along with a note about adding the slack token to the secrets for the repo

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I don't think we need this anymore. We have a GH application connected to Slack that can monitor this pipeline for us. I am gonna remove it permanently.

Copy link
Contributor

@MDunitz MDunitz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if you remove the slack notification code for now (instead of commenting it out) and create a ticket to add slack notifications for portal deployment. You could add the cde on line 62-69 there along with a note about adding the slack token to the secrets for the repo

Copy link
Contributor

@atolopko-czi atolopko-czi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Agree w/Madison we should enable or remove slack notification tho.

@ebezzi ebezzi requested a review from MDunitz May 13, 2022 19:29
@ebezzi ebezzi merged commit 25070e1 into main May 13, 2022
@ebezzi ebezzi deleted the ebezzi/ecs-cicd branch May 13, 2022 19:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants