Add 'software vulnerability' to glossary #810
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Michelle McAveety <michelle.mcaveety@chainguard.dev>
✅ Deploy Preview for ornate-narwhal-088216 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
ltagliaferri
approved these changes
Jun 28, 2023
Co-authored-by: ltagliaferri <lisa.tagliaferri@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type of change
Small addition to the Academy glossary to include a definition for 'software vulnerability' as new vulnerability/CVE articles will refer to them often (Wasn't sure how to label it)
What should this PR do?
Add one term to the glossary (didn't open issue because it is a small change)
Why are we making this change?
To provide more background to readers just starting to learn about software vulnerabilities
What are the acceptance criteria?
Proofread the addition, comment on it where/if necessary
How should this PR be tested?
As previous, proofread the addition and comment on it