Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: simplify go package name #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor

By default, the package name seems to be awscdkassetkubectlv20: https://github.com/cdklabs/awscdk-asset-kubectl-go/tree/kubectl.20.

This seems a bit redundant, so I want to simplify this to kubectlv20 (and similar for other versions).

If accepted, I plan to backport this to other branches of kubectl.

@kaizencc kaizencc changed the title chore: simplify packagename chore: simplify go package name Sep 21, 2022
@kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio backport kubectl-v21/main kubectl-v22/main

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 27, 2022

backport kubectl-v21/main kubectl-v22/main

✅ Backports have been created

@mergify mergify bot merged commit b121894 into kubectl-v20/main Sep 28, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2022
By default, the package name seems to be `awscdkassetkubectlv20`: https://github.com/cdklabs/awscdk-asset-kubectl-go/tree/kubectl.20.

This seems a bit redundant, so I want to simplify this to `kubectlv20` (and similar for other versions).

If accepted, I plan to backport this to other branches of kubectl.

(cherry picked from commit b121894)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2022
By default, the package name seems to be `awscdkassetkubectlv20`: https://github.com/cdklabs/awscdk-asset-kubectl-go/tree/kubectl.20.

This seems a bit redundant, so I want to simplify this to `kubectlv20` (and similar for other versions).

If accepted, I plan to backport this to other branches of kubectl.

(cherry picked from commit b121894)
@mergify mergify bot deleted the conroy/packagename branch September 28, 2022 05:33
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2022
This is an automatic backport of pull request #9 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).


---


<details>
<summary>Mergify commands and options</summary>

<br />

More conditions and actions can be found in the [documentation](https://docs.mergify.com/).

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

- `@Mergifyio refresh` will re-evaluate the rules
- `@Mergifyio rebase` will rebase this PR on its base branch
- `@Mergifyio update` will merge the base branch into this PR
- `@Mergifyio backport <destination>` will backport this PR on `<destination>` branch

Additionally, on Mergify [dashboard](https://dashboard.mergify.com/) you can:

- look at your merge queues
- generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com
</details>
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2022
This is an automatic backport of pull request #9 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).


---


<details>
<summary>Mergify commands and options</summary>

<br />

More conditions and actions can be found in the [documentation](https://docs.mergify.com/).

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

- `@Mergifyio refresh` will re-evaluate the rules
- `@Mergifyio rebase` will rebase this PR on its base branch
- `@Mergifyio update` will merge the base branch into this PR
- `@Mergifyio backport <destination>` will backport this PR on `<destination>` branch

Additionally, on Mergify [dashboard](https://dashboard.mergify.com/) you can:

- look at your merge queues
- generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com
</details>
This was referenced Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants