Handle defined shared memories in dwarf processing #8750
Merged
+22
−17
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit resolves an assert in the dwarf generating of core wasm modules when the module has a defined linear memory which is flagged `shared`. This is represented slightly differently in the `VMContext` than owned memories that aren't `shared`, and looks more like an imported memory. With support in bytecodealliance#8740 it's now much easier to support this. Closes bytecodealliance#8652
fitzgen
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit resolves an assert in the dwarf generating of core wasm modules when the module has a defined linear memory which is flagged
shared. This is represented slightly differently in theVMContextthan owned memories that aren'tshared, and looks more like an imported memory. With support in #8740 it's now much easier to support this.Closes #8652