Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor configuration for the pooling allocator #5205

Merged

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This commit changes the APIs in the wasmtime crate for configuring the pooling allocator. I plan on adding a few more configuration options in the near future and the current structure was feeling unwieldy for adding these new abstractions.

The previous struct-based API has been replaced with a builder-style API in a similar shape as to Config. This is done to help make it easier to add more configuration options in the future through adding more methods as opposed to adding more field which could break prior initializations.

This commit changes the APIs in the `wasmtime` crate for configuring the
pooling allocator. I plan on adding a few more configuration options in
the near future and the current structure was feeling unwieldy for
adding these new abstractions.

The previous `struct`-based API has been replaced with a builder-style
API in a similar shape as to `Config`. This is done to help make it
easier to add more configuration options in the future through adding
more methods as opposed to adding more field which could break prior
initializations.
@alexcrichton alexcrichton enabled auto-merge (squash) November 4, 2022 19:09
@github-actions github-actions bot added fuzzing Issues related to our fuzzing infrastructure wasmtime:api Related to the API of the `wasmtime` crate itself wasmtime:config Issues related to the configuration of Wasmtime labels Nov 4, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2022

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @fitzgen, @peterhuene

This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing", "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:config"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

  • fitzgen: fuzzing
  • peterhuene: wasmtime:api

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the .github/subscribe-to-label.json configuration file.

Learn more.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2022

Label Messager: wasmtime:config

It looks like you are changing Wasmtime's configuration options. Make sure to
complete this check list:

  • If you added a new Config method, you wrote extensive documentation for
    it.

    Our documentation should be of the following form:

    Short, simple summary sentence.
    
    More details. These details can be multiple paragraphs. There should be
    information about not just the method, but its parameters and results as
    well.
    
    Is this method fallible? If so, when can it return an error?
    
    Can this method panic? If so, when does it panic?
    
    # Example
    
    Optional example here.
    
  • If you added a new Config method, or modified an existing one, you
    ensured that this configuration is exercised by the fuzz targets.

    For example, if you expose a new strategy for allocating the next instance
    slot inside the pooling allocator, you should ensure that at least one of our
    fuzz targets exercises that new strategy.

    Often, all that is required of you is to ensure that there is a knob for this
    configuration option in wasmtime_fuzzing::Config (or one
    of its nested structs).

    Rarely, this may require authoring a new fuzz target to specifically test this
    configuration. See our docs on fuzzing for more details.

  • If you are enabling a configuration option by default, make sure that it
    has been fuzzed for at least two weeks before turning it on by default.


To modify this label's message, edit the .github/label-messager/wasmtime-config.md file.

To add new label messages or remove existing label messages, edit the
.github/label-messager.json configuration file.

Learn more.

@alexcrichton alexcrichton merged commit b14551d into bytecodealliance:main Nov 4, 2022
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the refactor-pooling-config branch November 4, 2022 20:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fuzzing Issues related to our fuzzing infrastructure wasmtime:api Related to the API of the `wasmtime` crate itself wasmtime:config Issues related to the configuration of Wasmtime
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants