Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tracking issue for the bulk memory operations proposal #928

Closed
14 tasks done
fitzgen opened this issue Feb 7, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
14 tasks done

Tracking issue for the bulk memory operations proposal #928

fitzgen opened this issue Feb 7, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@fitzgen
Labels
wasmtime Issues about wasmtime that don't fall into another label

Comments

@fitzgen
Copy link
Member

fitzgen commented Feb 7, 2020 •
edited
Loading

This is a tracking issue for the bulk memory operations proposal.

TODO:

  • Enable the bulk memory proposal's test suite
    • binary.wast
    • bulk.wast
    • custom.wast
    • data.wast
    • elem.wast
    • imports.wast
    • linking.wast
    • memory_copy.wast
    • memory_fill.wast
    • memory_init.wast
    • table_init.wast
    • table_copy.wast
  • Enable bulk memory in the fuzzers
@fitzgen fitzgen self-assigned this Feb 7, 2020
This was referenced Feb 7, 2020
Closed
Merged
Merged
fitzgen added a commit to fitzgen/wasmtime that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2020
@fitzgen
Add support for table.copy
01f66e8 
This adds support for the `table.copy` instruction from the bulk memory
proposal. It also supports multiple tables, which were introduced by the
reference types proposal.

Part of bytecodealliance#928
fitzgen added a commit to fitzgen/wasmtime that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2020
@fitzgen
Add support for table.copy
5eca0cf 
This adds support for the `table.copy` instruction from the bulk memory
proposal. It also supports multiple tables, which were introduced by the
reference types proposal.

Part of bytecodealliance#928
fitzgen added a commit to fitzgen/wasmtime that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2020
@fitzgen
Add support for table.copy
f459ea8 
This adds support for the `table.copy` instruction from the bulk memory
proposal. It also supports multiple tables, which were introduced by the
reference types proposal.

Part of bytecodealliance#928
fitzgen added a commit to fitzgen/wasmtime that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2020
@fitzgen
Add support for table.copy
e1ddbc3 
This adds support for the `table.copy` instruction from the bulk memory
proposal. It also supports multiple tables, which were introduced by the
reference types proposal.

Part of bytecodealliance#928
fitzgen added a commit to fitzgen/wasmtime that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2020
@fitzgen
Add support for table.copy
9f7b771 
This adds support for the `table.copy` instruction from the bulk memory
proposal. It also supports multiple tables, which were introduced by the
reference types proposal.

Part of bytecodealliance#928
fitzgen added a commit to fitzgen/wasmtime that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2020
@fitzgen
Add support for table.copy
c874929 
This adds support for the `table.copy` instruction from the bulk memory
proposal. It also supports multiple tables, which were introduced by the
reference types proposal.

Part of bytecodealliance#928
fitzgen added a commit to fitzgen/wasmtime that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2020
@fitzgen
Add support for table.copy
33b4a37 
This adds support for the `table.copy` instruction from the bulk memory
proposal. It also supports multiple tables, which were introduced by the
reference types proposal.

Part of bytecodealliance#928
@alexcrichton alexcrichton added the wasmtime Issues about wasmtime that don't fall into another label label Feb 27, 2020
@fitzgen
Copy link
Member Author

fitzgen commented Mar 11, 2020

Done!

@fitzgen fitzgen closed this as completed Mar 11, 2020
@tschneidereit tschneidereit mentioned this issue Jun 9, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@fitzgen fitzgen

Labels
wasmtime Issues about wasmtime that don't fall into another label
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@alexcrichton @fitzgen