Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Undercollateralized short positions should be called regardless of asks #606

Closed
abitmore opened this issue Jan 29, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@abitmore
Copy link
Member

See these screenshots for example:

There is one bitCNY short position whose collateral ratio is below 175%. However, because there are asks (selling CNY for BTS) with price (x BTS per CNY) lower than the feed price (named "settlement" on the screenshot), according to current rule, the short position is not margin called, instead, it shows a yellow price which is much higher than market price hanging on the order book. I think the short position should be matched with the top asks.

More discussion is here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,25886.0.html

@abitmore abitmore added this to the 201803 - Consensus Changing Release milestone Jan 29, 2018
@abitmore abitmore self-assigned this Jan 29, 2018
abitmore added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2018
For:
* #338 Margin call order fills at price of matching limit_order
* #343 Inconsistent sorting of call orders between matching against a limit order and a force settle order
* #453 Multiple limit order and call order matching issue
* #606 Undercollateralized short positions should be called regardless of asks
abitmore added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2018
abitmore added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2018
abitmore added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2018
abitmore added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2018
abitmore added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2018
For:
* #338 Margin call order fills at price of matching limit_order
* #343 Inconsistent sorting of call orders between matching against a limit order and a force settle order
* #453 Multiple limit order and call order matching issue
* #606 Undercollateralized short positions should be called regardless of asks
abitmore added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2018
abitmore added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2018
@abitmore
Copy link
Member Author

Done with #829.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants