Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For Cycle 8 #411

Closed
freimair opened this issue Nov 13, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

For Cycle 8 #411

freimair opened this issue Nov 13, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@freimair
Copy link
Member

freimair commented Nov 13, 2019

Summary

Specify the total amount of BSQ you are requesting:

  • BSQ requested: 11280 USD / 0,81 = 13926 BSQ

Contributions delivered

Provide links to contributions you have delivered, the amount of BSQ you are requesting for each, and any comments that will help stakeholders understand its value.

Contributions staged for merging

Provide links to work you're involved with that is still in progress. This section is optional, and is for your own benefit in keeping track of what you're doing and keeping other contributors up to date with the same.

Roles performed

Provide links to your monthly report on any roles you are responsible for.

@freimair freimair changed the title [WIP] For Cycle 8 For Cycle 8 Dec 13, 2019
@julianknutsen
Copy link

julianknutsen commented Dec 14, 2019

I think that it would be great for transparency to explain a little more about the PR reviews cost and how DAO voters should think about this work. Engineering is a major cost for the project and everything we can do to explain and justify the costs will help hold us accountable and ensure we are providing the maximum value to the project. Especially if the DAO needs to move towards a leaner spending model until volume improves.

I am also personally interested because I didn't originally plan the review & merge costs when doing my project estimates and many of these reviews are mine. If I can understand how "expensive" work is after I send it out for review I might be able to avoid work in the future that doesn't have a high enough ROI.

  • Do you use a $/hr rate for this work or is it a % of original PR value?
  • How much additional work is required when reviewing as a utAck vs an Ack. Is this work captured somewhere? PR comments, etc?
  • Does the PR reviews section include the costs of the Maintainer Role as well? I expected a separate section for that just like @ripcurlx request.
  • Can you help explain the difference between the $/review rate (which I understand isn't a great metric) between you and @ripcurlx's request?
    • You have an average cost of around $190/review while ripcurlx has $79/review and not all the reviews are mutually exclusive.
      • Is this due to the difference in expertise? experience? testing? time required? cost of living?
      • Is @ripcurlx undervaluing his work?

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Dec 22, 2019

Closed as accepted

@MwithM MwithM closed this as completed Dec 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants