Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add proxy-get over repl #75

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

Add proxy-get over repl #75

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

false -> lager:info("REPL CS block skip disabled")
end,

ok = riak_api_pb_service:register(riak_repl_pb_get, 128),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can be simplified into one line:

ok = riak_api_pb_service:register(riak_repl_pb_get, 128, 129),

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
-define(REPLICATE_CS_USER_OBJECTS, true).

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this header really necessary?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd be happy to put it in riak_repl.hrl if that's what you mean, just thought it'd be nice to have it separated out. Or did you mean having a default in a hrl at all?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, why does it need to be in a header at all, considering it is referenced in precisely one module.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes good point, fixed in dcbe896

@Vagabond
Copy link

+1 to merge this into the 1.2 branch when above concerns are addressed.

reiddraper and others added 2 commits August 29, 2012 15:00
They were only used in one place, so no point
in having them in a hrl.
@bookshelfdave
Copy link
Contributor Author

Manually merged into 1.2

@seancribbs seancribbs deleted the adt-proxy-get branch April 1, 2015 23:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants