[Bug]: Record constructor is not supported within a record-destructure or tuple-destructure

[dulajdilshan]

Description

It is not supported to have record-constructor in record binding pattern.

With #40283 fix, we have aligned the same behaviour in record-constructor for tuple-destructure.

Steps to Reproduce

Sample scenario in record destructure.

int a;
int b;
{a, b} = {a: 1, b: 2};    // error: record literal is not supported for record binding pattern

Sample scenario in tuple destructure.

int a;
int b;
[{a, b}] = [{a: 1, b: 2}];    // error: record literal is not supported for record binding pattern

Affected Version(s)

No response

OS, DB, other environment details and versions

No response

Related area

-> Compilation

Related issue(s) (optional)

Related issues:

• [Bug]: Can't use a mapping binding pattern within a list binding pattern against an open record #39324

Suggested label(s) (optional)

No response

Suggested assignee(s) (optional)

No response

[dulajdilshan]

Same as a combination of #19804 and #39324, hence closing this

[github-actions]

This issue is NOT closed with a proper Reason/ label. Make sure to add proper reason label before closing. Please add or leave a comment with the proper reason label now.

      - Reason/EngineeringMistake - The issue occurred due to a mistake made in the past.
      - Reason/Regression - The issue has introduced a regression.
      - Reason/MultipleComponentInteraction - Issue occured due to interactions in multiple components.
      - Reason/Complex - Issue occurred due to complex scenario.
      - Reason/Invalid - Issue is invalid.
      - Reason/Other - None of the above cases.