Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(udp/tcp): queue operations instead of throwing #279

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2021
Merged

feat(udp/tcp): queue operations instead of throwing #279

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2021

Conversation

azjezz
Copy link
Owner

@azjezz azjezz commented Nov 17, 2021

Signed-off-by: azjezz azjezz@protonmail.com

@azjezz azjezz added Priority: High After critical issues are fixed, these should be dealt with before any further issues. Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed by the requestor out of politeness Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes. labels Nov 17, 2021
@azjezz azjezz added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Nov 17, 2021
@azjezz azjezz self-assigned this Nov 17, 2021
@azjezz azjezz force-pushed the feat/network-queue branch 2 times, most recently from e1600c6 to a896b96 Compare November 17, 2021 16:12
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 17, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1472621568

  • 44 of 44 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 4 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1468774279: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 3207
Relevant Lines: 3207
💛 - Coveralls

@azjezz
feat(udp/tcp): queue operations instead of throwing
569e98d 
Signed-off-by: azjezz <azjezz@protonmail.com>
@azjezz azjezz merged commit 1467f0d into 2.0.x Nov 17, 2021
@azjezz azjezz deleted the feat/network-queue branch November 17, 2021 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@azjezz azjezz

Labels
Priority: High After critical issues are fixed, these should be dealt with before any further issues. Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed by the requestor out of politeness Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@azjezz @coveralls