[SEDONA-179] Claim OGC compliance

[BarbieQkiller]

Did you read the Contributor Guide?

• Yes, I have read Contributor Rules and Contributor Development Guide

Is this PR related to a JIRA ticket?

• Yes, the URL of the assoicated JIRA ticket is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-179. The PR name follows the format [SEDONA-179] my subject.

What changes were proposed in this PR?

The most relevant parts of OGC sfs tests for Geometry types and functions are implemented.
Findings: Two functions are not compliant plus some functions are not implemented in Sedona.
Tests for those are ignored with comments.

How was this patch tested?

Test suite.

Did this PR include necessary documentation updates?

• No, this PR does not affect any public API so no need to change the docs.

[jiayuasu]

@BarbieQkiller Thanks for this great PR. I have updated SEDONA-179 to reflect the latest progress and I also created a number of tickets to fix these tests.

A few questions:

1. I didn't see Test 51 here. Is there a particular reason?
2. I didn't see PostGIS implements PolygonFromWKB for Test 9. Do you know how they handle this case?

Thanks,
Jia

[BarbieQkiller]

@BarbieQkiller Thanks for this great PR. I have updated SEDONA-179 to reflect the latest progress and I also created a number of tickets to fix these tests.

A few questions:

1. I didn't see Test 51 here. Is there a particular reason?
2. I didn't see PostGIS implements PolygonFromWKB for Test 9. Do you know how they handle this case?

Thanks, Jia

Thank you for your kind response!

1. I simply missed that one, apologies. I will update the PR.
2. T9 verifies ST_AsBinary the missing PolygonFromWKB shouldn't be a problem.
   https://github.com/postgis/postgis/blob/f6def67654c25d812446239036cee44812613748/extras/ogc_test_suite/2_queries.sql#L255

Best regards
/Angela

[BarbieQkiller]

Added the missing test.
BR,
/Angela