[SEDONA-177] Extend RDD API for RangeQuery JoinQuery to support spatial predicates other than coveredBy and intersects. #700
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Did you read the Contributor Guide?
Is this PR related to a JIRA ticket?
What changes were proposed in this PR?
We've extended the RDD APIs for range query and spatial/distance join query.
Spatial Predicate Enums
We'll define 9 commonly used spatial predicates in enum
SpatialPredicate
:Spatial Range Query
User can specify one of the spatial predicates in
RangeQuery.SpatialRangeQuery
.Spatial Join Query
User can specify one of the spatial predicates in
JoinQuery.SpatialJoinQuery
.Distance Join Query
JoinQuery.DistanceJoinQuery
only acceptsINTERSECTS
orCOVERED_BY
as spatial predicates.Spatial join optimizer in Sedona SQL
Spatial join executors now correctly evaluate spatial predicates (ST_*), which resolves SEDONA-119.
How was this patch tested?
Added test cases for newly added APIs. The new data files containing test data were randomly generated.
Added test cases for SEDONA-119, which checks whether spatial predicates as spatial join conditions were correctly evaluated.
Did this PR include necessary documentation updates?