Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HDFS-17584. DistributedFileSystem verifyChecksum should be configurable #6947

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

2005hithlj
Copy link
Contributor

@2005hithlj 2005hithlj commented Jul 17, 2024

Description of PR

JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17584

How was this patch tested?

For code changes:

  • Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
  • Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

@2005hithlj
Copy link
Contributor Author

@slfan1989 @Hexiaoqiao Could you take a look? Thanks.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 17m 48s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗 xmllint 0m 0s xmllint was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 14m 11s Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚 mvninstall 37m 11s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 6m 0s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.23+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04.2
+1 💚 compile 5m 53s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_412-8u412-ga-1~20.04.1-b08
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 27s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 2m 20s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 51s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.23+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04.2
+1 💚 javadoc 2m 21s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_412-8u412-ga-1~20.04.1-b08
+1 💚 spotbugs 5m 53s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 41m 21s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 31s Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚 mvninstall 1m 59s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 5m 58s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.23+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04.2
+1 💚 javac 5m 58s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 5m 40s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_412-8u412-ga-1~20.04.1-b08
+1 💚 javac 5m 40s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
-0 ⚠️ checkstyle 1m 18s /results-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project.txt hadoop-hdfs-project: The patch generated 1 new + 44 unchanged - 0 fixed = 45 total (was 44)
+1 💚 mvnsite 2m 5s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 34s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.23+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04.2
+1 💚 javadoc 2m 11s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_412-8u412-ga-1~20.04.1-b08
+1 💚 spotbugs 5m 58s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 41m 32s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 2m 22s hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed.
-1 ❌ unit 260m 54s /patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 49s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
467m 32s
Reason Tests
Failed junit tests hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestFSNamesystemLockReport
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.44 ServerAPI=1.44 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6947/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #6947
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets xmllint
uname Linux ed33332280fe 5.15.0-94-generic #104-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 9 15:25:40 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / 5bfc17a
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_412-8u412-ga-1~20.04.1-b08
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.23+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04.2 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_412-8u412-ga-1~20.04.1-b08
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6947/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3012 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6947/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@slfan1989
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

@@ -6606,4 +6606,11 @@
Enables observer reads for clients. This should only be enabled when clients are using routers.
</description>
</property>
<property>
<name>dfs.client.verify.checksum.enabled</name>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @2005hithlj , Thanks for your works. There is already one interface to enable verify checksum, it seems more flexible IMO, so why we need to config it? Thanks again.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Hexiaoqiao Thanks for your review. Does the "interface" here refer to DistributedFileSystem.setVerifyChecksum?
For example, in some POC scenarios where the POC use cases are already fixed, which may be SQLs or other forms, if we want to turn off the checksum to observe the effect, it would be a better choice to do so through configuration items.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants