Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct the error code inspector working branch in scheduled testing. #11064

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2022

Conversation

win120a
Copy link
Contributor

@win120a win120a commented Dec 3, 2022

What is the purpose of the change

In scheduled testing, the error code inspector will only inspect error code in branch 3.1.

Brief changelog

Change properties in workflow files. (Specify the branch in checkout action.)

Verifying this change

Checklist

  • Make sure there is a GitHub_issue field for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not require a GitHub issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without pulling in other changes - one PR resolves one issue.
  • Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
  • Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
  • Check if is necessary to patch to Dubbo 3 if you are work on Dubbo 2.7
  • Write necessary unit-test to verify your logic correction, more mock a little better when cross module dependency exist. If the new feature or significant change is committed, please remember to add sample in dubbo samples project.
  • Add some description to dubbo-website project if you are requesting to add a feature.
  • GitHub Actions works fine on your own branch.
  • If this contribution is large, please follow the Software Donation Guide.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 3, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #11064 (4a56528) into 3.1 (3c68e94) will decrease coverage by 4.69%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                3.1   #11064      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     69.31%   64.61%   -4.70%     
+ Complexity      128       14     -114     
============================================
  Files          1470     1418      -52     
  Lines         76967    58966   -18001     
  Branches      13471     8651    -4820     
============================================
- Hits          53347    38100   -15247     
+ Misses        18962    16831    -2131     
+ Partials       4658     4035     -623     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...luster/router/script/ScriptStateRouterFactory.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...he/dubbo/test/common/impl/GreetingServiceImpl.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...zookeeper/curator/CuratorZookeeperTransporter.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...nfigure/DubboRelaxedBinding2AutoConfiguration.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
.../apache/dubbo/test/spring/SpringXmlConfigTest.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-96.16%) ⬇️
...egistrycenter/context/ZookeeperWindowsContext.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-81.82%) ⬇️
...istrycenter/processor/FindPidWindowsProcessor.java 5.40% <0.00%> (-81.09%) ⬇️
...pc/cluster/router/file/FileStateRouterFactory.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-80.96%) ⬇️
...ycenter/processor/KillProcessWindowsProcessor.java 10.00% <0.00%> (-80.00%) ⬇️
...nter/processor/StartZookeeperWindowsProcessor.java 17.39% <0.00%> (-78.27%) ⬇️
... and 442 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Copy link
Member

@AlbumenJ AlbumenJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@AlbumenJ AlbumenJ merged commit 93e6009 into apache:3.1 Dec 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants