Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add custom selection #249

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024
Merged

Add custom selection #249

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

YamLyubov
Copy link
Collaborator

@YamLyubov YamLyubov commented Dec 8, 2023

Now useres can set custom selection function of type custom_selection(populattion: PopulationT, pop_size: int]) -> PopulationT
#240

@YamLyubov YamLyubov linked an issue Dec 8, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@YamLyubov YamLyubov requested review from gkirgizov and maypink and removed request for gkirgizov December 8, 2023 15:00
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (085ca3d) 71.91% compared to head (837b653) 71.93%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #249      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.91%   71.93%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         136      136              
  Lines        8140     8143       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         5854     5858       +4     
+ Misses       2286     2285       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@maypink maypink mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2023
8 tasks
@YamLyubov YamLyubov merged commit cd16d39 into main Feb 14, 2024
6 checks passed
@YamLyubov YamLyubov deleted the custom-selection branch February 14, 2024 11:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

User-defined selections
4 participants